In light of the ongoing controversy surrounding Sun Wen’s alleged role as a representative of China, it’s fascinating how a situation can escalate so far beyond its origins. Sun’s actions vividly illustrate the drama of being a “guest in one camp but longing for another.” This incident raises a significant question for Chinese Americans involved in politics: who should you truly pledge your allegiance to—the United States or your country of origin?
This is not merely an example of baseless McCarthyism. Insiders reveal that although Sun came to the U.S. at a young age, gained citizenship, and received an American education, her family background has deeply influenced her perspective. She consistently refers to “our country,” which, for her, signifies China—not the U.S. This enduring attachment leads her to dismiss the implications of diplomatic bullying towards Taiwan or the suffering of Uighurs as problematic, contributing to her lack of connection to American identity and, consequently, respect for its laws and political ethics.
Most people aspire for a harmonious world, yet reality proves that conflicts, differences, and even hostilities between nations are often unavoidable. For minorities and new immigrants, having a home country that shares amicable relations and similar values with the U.S. is a fortunate circumstance. This fortunate alignment allows them to fluidly navigate dual identities. However, many members of the Chinese American community find themselves, in these complicated international relations, increasingly compelled to take sides.
As high-ranking officials in both countries view each other as rivals rather than allies, the expectation of loyalty to China versus loyalty to the United States becomes a zero-sum game. While ordinary citizens enjoy the constitutional right to express their patriotism freely, officials serving as representatives of American taxpayers must maintain a firm stance.
What is particularly frustrating about Sun Wen is that she is not an elected official and thus does not face pressure from pro-China constituents. Her actions suggest a willful disregard for her responsibilities. Given that she did not come into her position through a democratic process, it begs the question: who is accountable for her rise to such prominence? Shouldn’t the governor who appointed her reflect on their choice to elevate someone of her background? A casual comment like, “Sun Wen was hired by the former governor,” cannot absolve them of responsibility.
